Subjective/opinionated game reviews – good or poor?

June 01st, 2008 | Category: Nintendo News

Who the hell knows what would form a good review? Is there a style that would be universally accepted? I often try and think of new ways to review games…I actually just spent a few hours tonight doing so. Reviews right now fall into the very opinionated approach. I am

not saying that is a poor thing at all…just stating it as fact. Is that how you like your reviews, or do you have something else in mind that might work out better?

Article here

gaming news, playstation3, nintendo wii, xbox 360, video games,Nintendo News
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • De.lirio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • BlinkList
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • PlugIM
  • Scoopeo
  • Spurl
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
Related Articles
  • DS review roundup
  • Game reviews: the ugly path from publisher to publishing
  • EGM reviews, previews, and news - Tecmo Bowl: Kickoff confirmed for Wii and DS, Castlevania Wii rumor
  • Game reviewers are lazy
  • GameSpot’s reviews for FFCC: My Life as a King & LostWinds - too low?

    • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply